ThumMusings

Bringing the user interface of music-making into the 21st Century, and changing the world... one note at a time.

My Photo
Name: ThumMeister
Location: Austin, Texas, United States

In the late 1980’s, I tried to write insanely great code for the Mac and help others do so, too. When Windows swept through the Valley in 1991-2, I realized my great code would become worthless if the Mac platform sank. I became very interested in knowing how to spot winning platforms. Since Microsoft clearly knew how to make its platforms succeed, I joined its Systems Strategy Group. While designing and executing practical "technology evangelism" campaigns, I studied the theory behind the practice, eventually teaching mandatory "how-to" seminars to Microsoft's new evangelists. I left Microsoft in 2000, looking for a new industry to disrupt. When my wife quit her piano lessons after six months of diligent practice, saying that “music is just too hard,” I knew I’d found it. Hammering the Web relentlessly, I found a novel combination of old ideas which could make music dramatically easier to teach, learn, & play, more emotionally expressive, and expand the frontiers of tonality. This blog tells the story of my bringing those innovations to market.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Faster = Cheaper = Easier

I think I've been explaining the benefits of the ThumMusic System to music educators in the wrong terms.
  • When I emphasize cost reduction, some educators freak out, associating lower cost with lower quality.
  • When I emphasize ease of learning, some educators freak out, associating easier with dumbing down.
Instead, I think I need to emphasize "increasing the rate of learning." Music educators don't seem to have a reflexively negative association with the concept of "increasing the rate of learning." By avoiding their negatively-charged reflexive responses, I give music educators the opportunity to form a reflective response.

Cost, ease, and speed are all just different facets of the same gem. If a given level of musical understanding and skill takes a long time to acquire, then it's hard and expensive (in hours invested). If the same level can be gained in less time – that is, more rapidly – then it is easier and less expensive. Increasing speed increases ease and lowers cost.

It's my understanding from research papers that I read on the Web a couple of years ago (I'll look for them again later) that the #1 reason why students quit their music lessons is because they don't feel that they are making sufficient progress to justify the hours invested. Rapid progress is exciting; slow progress is boring. By speeding up the rate at which students acquire a given level of musical knowledge and skill, music education becomes inherently more exciting, so its drop-out rate should decline, and a higher percentage of students should be successful.

This is exactly what I've been saying all along, but I've been saying it in economic terms or ease-of-use terms. These terms resonate very well with investors and technology folks, but have not proven to resonate well with music educators. I'll try casting the ideas in "rate of learning" terms, and see if that works any better.

This is just a choice-of-language issue. I should speak not to music educators in the language of economics any more than I should address a Chinese audience in Japanese. Bad associations, either way.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home